Santa Anita was a canary in a cole mine. But scared money don’t make money, and if horse wagering is it in for the long-haul, they better get ready for some turbulence.
And that’s OK. Because it beats computers having all the fun….until a sure death, anyway.
ICYMI: Santa Anita’s October 2025 fall meet closed with a nine point one percent drop in handle. Some blamed the lack of promotions. Others blamed weaker opening weekend buzz.
But the real shock hit when Computer Assisted Wagering groups quietly reduced their action by eight and a half million dollars.
Yup – 8.5 MILLLLLLION BUCKS. WOOF.
Catastrophic. That is how dependent racing has become on a handful of algorithmic betting teams. Not fans. Not long time handicappers. Not families coming out for a day at the track. Just machines pulling levers.
For years, the industry insisted CAWs were a necessary evil. Today we are seeing what happens when the “necessary” part collapses.
Why Handle Took a Hit
A weaker promotional season
Last year’s California Crown festival drew more than twenty one thousand fans and nearly eighteen million in handle on opening Saturday. This year, with no festival, the number dropped to eleven point six million.
Promotions matter.
The CAW pullback
But the eight and a half million dollar fall in CAW wagering is the real bombshell. When Santa Anita restricted their last second access to the win pool, they simply bet less. And when they bet less, the numbers cratered.
This is not a healthy ecosystem. This is dependency.
Bettors Have Been Warning About This for Years
Everyday players have been shouting about late odds drops, disappearing value, confusing pools, and the feeling that the game is rigged against them. They were told to adjust. They were told that CAWs were good for the sport because they “grow handle.”
Now we see the truth. CAW money is not a foundation. It is a flimsy support beam that collapses the minute the teams lose even a sliver of advantage.
If the industry wants to build something sustainable, it must treat this moment as a turning point.
If We Take CAWs Away, Here Is How We Fix Racing
It is time for solutions. Not excuses. Not fear. Not the constant refrain that the sport cannot live without CAWs. It can. It just requires work.
Below is a realistic five step plan grounded in fact, data, and basic economic logic that would make racing stronger, healthier, and more fan focused if CAWs were severely limited or removed.
A Five Step Plan to Repair Racing Without CAWs
Step 1: Lower takeout to fair and competitive levels
The 20% takeout that bettors face is one of the highest in all of gambling.
Lower takeout stimulates handle because players churn their bankroll longer.
This is not theory. It has been proven in Kentucky, California, New York, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, and virtually every jurisdiction with competitive wagering. Lower takeout grows participation.
Contrary to popular belief — the United States is not the entire world. Other people try other things…and sometimes they work! Copy it.
Step 2: Modernize the tote with real time transparency
The tote system is ancient and confusing. Bettors deserve a modern, real time display of incoming wagers. When late money hits, people should see it immediately instead of watching odds collapse after the bell.
A transparent tote — possibly using blockchain technology — rebuilds trust and eliminates the suspicion that the game is rigged.
Step 3: Replace CAW rebates with fan rewards
Right now, the biggest discounts and rebates go to private wagering teams. Everyday bettors who wager weekly or monthly get nothing.
Racing should flip this. Create loyalty tiers. Offer small rebates for volume. Give perks to on track players.
Casinos do this. Sportsbooks do this. Airlines do this. Racing can too.
Step 4: Invest in events that grow real attendance
The California Crown weekend proved that major promotions work. When the track feels alive, new fans are created.
Racing needs more concerts, family events, food festivals, college nights, and cultural celebrations. Handle is tied to energy and energy comes from people on the grounds.
Make Horse Wagering Great Again.
Step 5: Strengthen field size and race quality
Field size rose to seven point nine runners per race this fall. That is a step in the right direction. Bigger fields create better betting opportunities and more interesting races. Tracks should improve conditions, balance the schedule, and coordinate with horsemen to protect field depth. Bettors respond to value and choice.
The Fork in the Road
Santa Anita’s fall meet exposed a truth the industry has tried to hide. The sport cannot base its future on a few private wagering accounts. That is not growth. That is not stability. That is not sustainability.
If CAWs disappear tomorrow, racing is not doomed. Racing is simply forced to return to what worked for a century. Fair pricing. Transparent systems. Real fans. Big events. Trust.
The five steps above are not radical. They are common sense. The only question is whether the sport has the courage to stop relying on machines and start rebuilding a game that people actually want to bet.
This moment is a warning. It can also be a reset.
Leave a Reply